This entry is part 2 of 3 in the series Sermon on the Mount

So we come to the Beatitudes in the series on the Sermon on the Mount (Mt 5:3-12).  These have sometimes been ignored (as impossible to live up to); sometimes seen as Jesus setting the demands of Holy Living so high that we are driven to Him to find grace; and occasionally as entrance requirements to the Kingdom (you must be like this to enter the Kingdom…).

Beatitudes Most commonly, though, they have been presented, as ideal or virtues that “good” Christians should aspire towards.  Hence they are sometimes called the “be-attitudes”!  To read them this way, does require some gymnastics with the mean of the words, which are invariably spiritualised.  So “blessed are those who mourn” is taken from it clear meaning of people who have suffered some kind of bereavement or loss, to people who mourn or grieve over their Sin.

To understand the Matthew passage, we must also keep in mind Luke’s version of the beatitudes (Lk 6:20-23), which invariably make the blessing more gritty and earthy:  blessed are the poor (instead of Matthew’s poor in spirit); blessed are the hungry (rather than those who hunger and thirst after righteousness).  Further insight in gleaned when we consider Isa 61, which has many echoes of the people that Jesus is referring to in the beatitudes, but Isa 61 it clear that the Holy Spirit is to break in the lives of these people to bring deliverance, to set them free, to comfort them, to bring hope instead of mourning.

All this pushes us to reconsider the beatitudes.  It seems to me that they speak, not so much as virtues to aspire for, but they say more about what God blesses.  He blesses people, that the world around us considers not worthy of being blessed.

You don’t have to be like these to people to be blessed.

But if you are like these people you can be blessed by God.

The “poor” being refereed to here, are the lowest of the low of society.  The unclean and the expendable.  The drop outs, the dregs, the failures, the won’t be missed, not noticed, irrelevant of society.  The ones that are hidden away, an embarrassment, shunned, pushed, trodden down.  And Jesus says that even they can be blessed by God.   The Kingdom is theirs.   The values of the Kingdom are turning everything upside down. 

We live in a world (and often a church) that blesses the successful, go getters, rich, powerful, attractive, those people who have got it together.  But Jesus blesses people in spite of their inadequacies.  Not because they are virtuous.  But in spite of their brokenness and failure.

And we are called to be like Jesus, and do the same.

 

 

Technorati Tags:

 

I will write in a later post my view of the other blessings in Matthew 5.

Series Navigation«Sermon on the MountSermon on the Mount – Salt and Light (Part 1)»

Tags:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

2 Comments »

Comment by Liz Holt Subscribed to comments via email
2009-02-16 09:52:50

Hi Rupert,

I was wondering how you would unpack the word ‘blessing’. What do you think it actually means?

Liz

 
Comment by Adam Archibald Subscribed to comments via email
2009-03-27 09:18:56

Hi Rupert,

Listening to the radio this morning prompted me to think whom Jesus would have been criticised for being friends with were he to have lived in today’s Britain, given his predilection for those most hated and despised by society at large – after all, the kingdom of God is precisely for them also.

These days, probably not publicans (nobody’s more popular than the local pub landlord) not tax collectors (most people realise that it’s only due to the Inland Revenue that public spending exists) not prostitutes (celebrated by a number of popular TV serials and films) nor “sinners” (their exploits are publicly celebrated in the tabloids (not to mention arthouse films) and they’re favourably selected for reality TV shows). The one minor exception would probably be parking attendants.

The beatitudes list might have changed somewhat too, given e.g. the fact that such a large amount of social discourse (and spending) is already directed towards helping the poor.

So whom could Jesus have infuriated today’s hegemony by befriending? Currently, wealthy bankers would come near the top of the list. As would paedophiles, terrorists, racists, domestic abusers and violent chavs. Possibly politicians too, as the most scapegoated group in society.

What do you think? Any more to add to the list?

And should this influence whom we choose to befriend?

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post