younger evangelicalsIn this book, by Robert Webber, he is attempting to “interpret the changing face of evangelicalism since about 1950 and projects where evangelicalism is going in the next decades” admittedly from a North American perspective.

In the introduction, Webber sets the scene for the book, by defining what he means by “Younger Evangelicals”, not limiting young to only young in age, but also young in spirit. In fact, he says that Brian McLaren (who I don’t think by any definition you could say was young - sorry Brian!), is the archetypal leader of a younger evangelical.

He sees the younger evangelicals as:

“anyone, older or younger, who deals thoughtfully with the shift from twentieth to twenty-first century culture. He or she is committed to construct a biblically rooted, historically informed, and culturally aware new evangelical witness in the twenty first century.” p.15

The younger evangelical he sees in contrast to what he calls the “traditional evangelicals” (or fundamentalists) from the 1950’s onwards and the “pragmatic evangelicals” from 1975 onward (typified by Bill Hybels). He sees though, both these older forms of evangelicals primarily shaped and operating in a modern worldview. The younger evangelicals are the first to be shaped and operate in a postmodern worldview.

I find this a hugely helpful introduction and helps explain some of the conflict seen in the church world at the moment. There is a huge shift happening in culture, and in church, and the transition needs to happen for the gospel to be contextualised in the culture of today. There are of course dangers (certainly of imbibing too much of the culture, that we are no longer distinct and prophetic), but the transition is essential. However, in many churches (and I think ours is no exception) we are a mix of pragmatic evangelicals and younger evangelicals and there can often be great misunderstanding.

However, we would all do well to remember that we come from the same stream, belong the same “side”, and have far more in common than we do differences.

RSS feed | Trackback URI

3 Comments »

Comment by Alastair Subscribed to comments via email
2007-01-24 14:13:45

I’ve not heard this term before. Is it a synonym for an emerging church punter? Or is he talking about the a halfway house between traditional evangelicalism and the emerging church?

 
Comment by paul Subscribed to comments via email
2007-01-28 07:32:09

lol, always makes me think of ‘young fogeys.’

There are of course emerging streams in other denominations other than evengelicals who are exploring in the context of postmodernism…

I think most orthodox christians agree on the headlines just have differing practices, expressions, emphasies which is why I think encouraging deep church/a generous orthodoxy is such an important part of the conversation…

 
Comment by Rupert Ward Subscribed to comments via email
2007-01-28 23:14:23

Thanks for the comments guys.

I hadn’t heard the term before, and wasn’t too sure about the book, except a number of people had recommended it, so thought i should read it, and have enjoyed it.

I think he is probably really referring to emerging church folks primarily, but i think Paul’s point of others, other than evangelicals, are exploring postmodernism is true.

I think the title is probably more about the view of the author, and his commitment to evangelicalism than the content of the book, which is probably more about culteral change and how the church should respond to that.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post